Announcement PDF ASX Announcement Right Resources Limited ABN 81 649 632 744 www.rightresources.com.au 41-47 Colin Street West Perth WA 6005 +61 8 6245 2050 ASX:RRE 21 May 2026 High-Grade Tungsten Mineralisation Identified at Blue Prospect Highlights • Assay results from the recently identified Blue Prospect have returned variable tungsten grades up to 4.3% WO3 from rock samples, confirming the presence of high-grade tungsten mineralisation within the Company's Tumbarumba tenements. • A tungsten-bismuth-molybdenum soil anomaly covering 2.1 km x 1.8 km has been defined at Blue Prospect from pXRF soil sampling, with high-grade rock chip results occurring within this anomaly. The anomaly remains open in all directions. • Multiple tungsten minerals confirmed in outcrop, including scheelite and wolframite (primary tungsten minerals), with additional tungsten oxide minerals interpreted from field observations including tungstite, meymacite and stolzite. Scheelite has been independently verified by CODES researchers (Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania) during a February 2026 site visit. • Blue Prospect was identified through systematic application of the Company's RIRGS exploration model, developed in collaboration with CODES. Initial CODES analysis is being received and will be released to the market following review. • Exploration Licence EL9889 (granted April 2026) covers the interpreted western extension of the anomaly, providing potential to expand the Blue Prospect footprint. • Tungsten is an Australian Government-listed critical mineral, with growing strategic demand from the defence, advanced manufacturing and energy sectors. Right Resources Limited (ASX: RRE) (Right Resources or the Company) is pleased to report assay results from the Blue tungsten prospect, located on EL9028 near Tumbarumba, New South Wales, which have returned grades of up to 4.3% WO3 from rock chip samples. The results confirm the presence of high- grade tungsten mineralisation within a defined 2.1 km x 1.8 km multi-element soil anomaly that remains open in all directions. Background - Blue Prospect Discovery Blue Prospect, which is situated within the broader regional setting surrounding the Pilot Project but represents a distinct and independent mineral system, was identified through the Company’s systematic regional exploration programme, applying a Reduced Intrusion-Related Gold System (RIRGS) exploration model developed in collaboration with CODES (Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania). The model predicts a characteristic metal zonation pattern for this style of system, with tungsten and bismuth expected in a proximal position of an intrusion-related hydrothermal system, consistent with the geochemical signature observed at Blue. An initial programme comprising systematic soil sampling (~200 m spacing), geological mapping, and rock chip sampling was completed between February 2026 and April 2026 (Figure 1). During a February 2026 field visit, CODES researchers independently confirmed the presence of scheelite within quartz veins at multiple outcrop and subcrop locations, providing third-party scientific verification of the tungsten potential. Initial CODES analysis relating to the broader geological framework is being received by the Company and will be released to the market following review. 2 www.rightresources.com.au Assay Results up to 4.3% Tungsten Trioxide All rock chip samples collected from the Blue Prospect have been assayed by a certified laboratory. Results returned tungsten grades of up to 34,600 ppm W (3.4% W, equivalent to approximately 4.3% WO₃) (Figure 2), with multiple samples returning material tungsten values. All results have passed QAQC standards. The highest-grade rock samples identified in the field based on pXRF readings were not selectively prioritised for assay and have instead been submitted to CODES for further testwork. Figure 1: Tungsten (W) high-grade certified rock chip results occur within the defined anomaly. Grade context for rock sample results for the 4.3% WO3 result: • Global tungsten deposits are typically reported in WO₃ (tungsten trioxide). 3.4% W is equivalent to approximately 4.3% WO₃. • The Blue Prospect rock sample results have a wide distribution and consistent with the defined scale of 2.1 km x 1.8 km tungsten soil anomaly, which is open in all directions. Rock chip results are selective samples of outcrop and subcrop and are not necessarily representative of average mineralisation across the broader prospect area. They confirm the presence of high-grade tungsten mineralisation within the defined anomaly and justify systematic follow-up work. 3 www.rightresources.com.au Soil Anomaly - 2.1 km x 1.8 km, Open in All Directions Systematic pXRF soil sampling completed in April 2026 has outlined a coherent multi-element soil anomaly covering 2.1 km x 1.8 km at Blue Prospect (Figure 2), characterised by coincident tungsten, bismuth and molybdenum enrichment. The sampling protocol comprised five pXRF readings per sample, with averaged results presented: • Tungsten (W) up to 37 ppm (>10 ppm represents approximately 10 times background) (Figure 3) • Bismuth (Bi) up to 23 ppm (>1 ppm represents approximately 10 times background) (Figure 6) • Molybdenum (Mo) up to 9 ppm (>5 ppm represents approximately 10 times background) (Figure 6) The anomaly remains open in all directions and is interpreted to extend westward onto EL9889, granted April 2026. Additional soil sampling is ongoing to define the full extent of the system. Figure 2: Blue Prospect sampling location map showing EL9028 and EL9889 covering the interpreted western extension of the tungsten-bismuth-molybdenum anomaly, Tumbarumba district, NSW. 4 www.rightresources.com.au Figure 3: Tungsten (W) pXRF soil anomaly at Blue Prospect (2.1 km x 1.8 km). High-grade certified rock chip results occur within the defined anomaly. Geological Setting - Sheeted Vein System in an Intrusive Host Geological mapping at Blue Prospect has defined a well-developed sheeted vein system comprising quartz- dominant and locally brecciated veins hosted within a sheared and altered intrusive sequence. Individual veins are typically up to 0.4 m thick, forming sheeted vein arrays of 20 m to greater than 70 m width across the prospect. Multiple tungsten mineral species have been identified at Blue Prospect, supporting a primary, hydrothermal origin for the tungsten mineralisation: • Scheelite (CaWO₄) - the primary ore mineral of tungsten, confirmed by UV fluorescence observations and supported by pXRF analysis • Wolframite ((Fe,Mn)WO₄) - an important primary tungsten ore mineral • Tungstite (WO₃.H₂O), meymacite (WO₃.2H₂O) and stolzite (PbWO₄) - interpreted secondary tungsten minerals based on field observations, indicating potential supergene enrichment of a primary system 5 www.rightresources.com.au Figure 4: Scheelite under short-wave UV light showing characteristic bright blue fluorescence - independently verified by CODES researchers, February 2026. Independent Verification - CODES During a February 2026 field visit to the Tumbarumba district, researchers from CODES accompanied the Company to the Blue Prospect. Dr Francisco Testa independently confirmed the presence of scheelite within quartz veins at multiple outcrop and subcrop locations, providing independent verification of the presence of tungsten mineralisation at the Blue Prospect. Under the hand lens, Dr Testa also identified what appears to be traces of bismuthinite (Bi₂S₃). CODES is widely regarded as one of the world's leading independent ore deposit research institutions. Initial CODES analysis of the broader Tumbarumba district is being received by the Company and will be released to the market following review. Tungsten - A Critical Mineral of Growing Strategic Importance Tungsten is classified as a critical mineral by both the Australian Government and the United States Department of Interior. It is an essential metal for defence applications, advanced manufacturing, mining equipment, renewable energy technologies and electronics. China currently controls approximately 85% of global tungsten supply, making Australian tungsten resources of significant strategic and commercial interest. The Australian Government has included tungsten in its Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve, and demand from the defence sector is expected to increase materially in the near term driven by increased global military spending. Next Steps • Continue systematic soil sampling and geological mapping at Blue Prospect to define the full extent of the 2.1 km x 1.8 km anomaly, including assessment of the western extension on EL9889 • Collect additional outcrop samples for early-stage metallurgical testwork to support understanding of tungsten recovery characteristics • Advance targeting with follow-up geophysics and subsurface interpretation to identify drill targets • Progress permitting for drill testing of the Blue Prospect system • Release initial CODES analysis of the broader Tumbarumba district following review ENDS This announcement has been approved for release by the Board of Right Resources Limited. 6 www.rightresources.com.au Further Information Graham Howard Managing Director E: info@rightresources.com.au Jessamyn Lyons Company Secretary E: jessamyn.lyons@rightresources.com.au Media David Tasker Chapter One Advisors E: dtasker@chapteroneadvisors.com.au Follow Us About Right Resources (ASX: RRE) Right Resources Limited is a New South Wales-based mineral exploration company focused on advancing a portfolio of gold, copper and critical mineral assets across 2,518 km² of tenements in the Tumbarumba and New England regions, both located within historically significant goldfields and mineral provinces. The Company's flagship asset is the Pilot Project, a high-grade gold target in the Tumbarumba Region with a history of high-grade underground gold production (~38 g/t Au), which is being advanced through a maiden diamond drilling programme in collaboration with CODES (Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania). The Blue Prospect tungsten discovery adds a significant critical minerals dimension to the Company's portfolio. Forward Statements This announcement may contain forward-looking statements or information, including forecasts, projections, opinions and conclusions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance or statements of fact. Actual events and results may differ materially due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including funding requirements, metal prices, exploration and development risks, and operational challenges. Rock chip results are selective samples of outcrop and are not necessarily representative of average mineralisation across the broader prospect area and should not be relied upon as an indication of bulk grade or mineralised tonnage. Competent Person Statement Graham Howard The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation compiled by Graham Howard, who is Managing Director of Right Resources Limited. Mr Howard is a Competent Person who is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Howard has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (JORC, 2012). Mr Howard consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Previously Reported Exploration Results The Company confirms that it is unaware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in previous market announcements. The form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements. All previously released market announcements can be found on the Company’s website at rightresources.com.au. 7 www.rightresources.com.au Appendix 1 - JORC Table 1, Sections 1 - 2 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • No drilling has been completed by the Company across EL9028. • Samples taken by the Company across the Blue Prospect, EL9028 include: - 35 surface rock samples of outcrop and subcrop were collected by experienced field crew. These samples included; in-field UV light, pXRF and geological mineral identification. The highest-grade samples based on in-field pXRF were not preselected for assay. These samples have been assigned to CODES for testwork. - Gold samples have been submitted to ALS Perth for PhotonAssay and follow up multielement geochemistry. - 107 surface soil samples from the B Horizon were analysed using a portable XRF analyzer. - XRF analysis are point samples of soil samples collected. Company protocol is to take five (5) XRF readings per soil sample. - The Company also applied visual and use of short wavelength ultraviolet light to confirm visible scheelite. Drilling Techniques • Drill type (eg. core, reverse circulation, open hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc) • No drilling has occurred across the Blue Prospect on EL9028. Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • No drilling has occurred across the Blue Prospect on EL9028. Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • All rock samples were geologically logged. Geological logging per sample is qualitative in nature. • The rock samples reflect a surface point sample and do not represent a total length across the area. • Photos of the samples were taken of samples as part of company protocols. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • Whole sample processing of the 35 rock samples was completed at the laboratory. 8 www.rightresources.com.au Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. • No splitting of the samples occurred due to sample weight <3kg. • Samples were dried, crushed and pulverised with 85% passing 75 microns • Representative samples of outcrop were taken. • The rock samples taken by the Company indicate the potential grade variability within the project area. • No field duplicates were taken. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie. lack of bias) and precision have been established. For all Company Rock Samples: • Rock samples were dried, crushed and pulverised to produce a 50g charge for multielement analysis • Multi-element analysis was completed using Triple Quad, Four Acid Super Trace and Four Acid Digest methodologies (ME- MS85), with ICP-MS utilised as the analytical instrument. Samples returning >10,000 ppm W were additionally analysed by XRF (ME-XRF15B). • Gold samples have been submitted to ALS Perth for PhotonAssay, results pending. • Photon analysis only requires rock sample to be crushed. • The Company uses certified reference material (CRM) for all gold, geochemistry samples at a targeted frequency of 1 every 20 samples. • No blank material has been used. • No external laboratory checks have occurred. • CRM performance falls within acceptable limits of 2 Standard Deviations. For all Company Soil Samples: • Portable XRF (Olympus Vanta V2MR portable XRF analyser) was calibrated using inbuilt Vanta calibration methodology for each session of XRF analysis. Vanta XRF confirmed it was calibrated to manufacturers specification for each analytical session. Company protocol included testing using portable XRF unit output with CRM material Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • Company completed XRF analysis at laboratory for select rock samples including high grade samples • Two batches of soil samples were issued to laboratory for QAQC of XRF results • No field duplicates of rock samples were taken 9 www.rightresources.com.au Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • Assay lab duplicate was completed on assays >10000 ppm • No field duplicates of soil samples have been taken by the Company. • No adjustments have been made to the assay data received by the laboratory. Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • The horizontal datum used is GDA 94 and projection is MGA zone 55. The vertical datum is AHD71. • Surface topography has been generated using high resolution LiDAR survey completed by the Company in October 2023. • The surface topography has been used to improve elevations of the sample data. • Hand held GPS unit has been used to determine location with an estimated accuracy of +/- 5m. Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Soil samples were completed on a nominal 200m x 200m grid in a recently planted pine forest • Rock samples were collected as part of completing soil grid and where outcrop was located • Limited rock out crop occurs at surface resulting in data spacing is clustered and not evenly distributed across the surface. • This program traversed a recently planted pine forest • No drilling has occurred at the project. • The distribution of sampling is limited to the surface and is not used for Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimations. • No sample compositing has been applied. Rock samples reflect point sampling at surface. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • Soil samples were collected on a nominal 200m x 200m square patten. • Rock samples reflect reconnaissance along roads and in forest area where outcrop / subcrop was located • Mineralisation system is hosted within dominantly granodiorite intrusive package. • Sheeted quartz and quartz tourmaline veins up to 40 cm width have been mapped to extend over tens of meters in strike within alteration and sheared package. Intense zones as observed range from a 20m to 70m width. • Vein systems trend between 230 deg to 280 deg within a quasi circular shaped tungsten soil anomaly, which is interpreted to be ringed by molybdenum soil results. Pegmatite veins common and work is progressing to understand relationships. Work by CODES has defined metal zonation in the Blue Prospect area based on review of outcrop and geochemistry. 10 www.rightresources.com.au Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • The Company maintains a chain of custody of all samples from collection through to laboratory submission. Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • CODES have visited sites in Blue Prospect in February 2026 and also independently verified tungsten minerals. Samples collected by CODES are currently being analysed to define mineralisation system characteristics Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. • The tenement EL9028 is 100% owned by Right Resources Ltd in New South Wales, Australia. • The samples were collected in the Green Hills State Forest (pine) operated by NSW forestry. • Historical alluvial mining has been mined in the creeks through the Project Areas. Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. • Historic mining work occurred between 1855 and 1954 across the Tumbarumba Gold Fields. • The Company has obtained hardcopy reports and maps in relation to this information as part of its historical review in preparation for their current work program. • The historic data comprises mine production records from the NSW Mine Registrar. • There is no known modern exploration in the Blue Prospect area on EL9028. Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. • The broader mineralisation system is interpreted to be reduced intrusive related system. Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. • No drilling has occurred across the Blue Prospect on EL9028. Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such • No data aggregation or grade cuts have occurred. 11 www.rightresources.com.au Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). • The nature of the potential mineralisation is striking 230 to 260 degrees • Surface mapping and rock samples reflected clustered data which has been utilised to determine potential geometry and width of mineralisation. Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. • For a plan image of the sample distribution across the project area refer to Figure 1, 2 and 6. • Only surface point samples have been reported therefore sections are not applicable. Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. • All data presented in this announcement are based on Company Sample data within the Tumbarumba Tenement Areas. • Reporting of both low and high grades have been included. • Refer to Appendix 2 for reported results. Other substantive exploration data • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. • The Company completed a high-resolution LiDAR survey in October 2023, followed by surface petrology sampling in 2024 and 2025. Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. • The Company will conduct follow‑up mapping and systematic rock and soil sampling along the structures hosting the high‑grade and anomalous samples within EL9028 to better define the geological architecture and extent of the anomalies. Appendix 2 - Reporting Results Table 1: Reported Assay Results (Rockchips) (Coordinate system GDA94/MGA55) SAMPLE NUMBER LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE EASTING NORTHING W_ppm WO3 (%) RTRK_00237 EL9028 ROCK 592699 6061932 617 0.08 RTRK_00238 EL9028 ROCK 592684 6062053 2560 0.32 RTRK_00239 EL9028 ROCK 592684 6062053 411 0.05 RTRK_00240 EL9028 ROCK 592684 6062053 6030 0.76 RTRK_00241 EL9028 ROCK 592684 6062053 2390 0.30 RTRK_00242 EL9028 ROCK 592684 6062053 37 0.00 RTRK_00243 EL9028 ROCK 592694 6062101 15 0.00 RTRK_00245 EL9028 ROCK 592341 6062160 256 0.03 12 www.rightresources.com.au SAMPLE NUMBER LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE EASTING NORTHING W_ppm WO3 (%) RTRK_00246 EL9028 ROCK 592250 6062000 22 0.00 RTRK_00247 EL9028 ROCK 592250 6062000 32 0.00 RTRK_00248 EL9028 ROCK 591938 6061622 5 0.00 RTRK_00249 EL9028 ROCK 592225 6061277 1840 0.23 RTRK_00250 EL9028 ROCK 592120 6061192 11 0.00 RTRK_00251 EL9028 ROCK 591928 6060923 7 0.00 RTRK_00252 EL9028 ROCK 591726 6060881 17 0.00 RTRK_00253 EL9028 ROCK 591449 6061304 58 0.01 RTRK_00254 EL9028 ROCK 591477 6061356 80 0.01 RTRK_00255 EL9028 ROCK 591477 6061356 1360 0.17 RTRK_00256 EL9028 ROCK 590912 6061065 7 0.00 RTRK_00257 EL9028 ROCK 592762 6062245 136 0.02 RTRK_00258 EL9028 ROCK 592913 6062790 4 0.00 RTRK_00263 EL9028 ROCK 592634 6061093 39 0.00 RTRK_00264 EL9028 ROCK 592600 6061392 3 0.00 RTRK_00265 EL9